In this video (titled Does The Universe Have Purpose?), William Lane Craig proposes the idea that evil actually supports God’s existence. Co-opting one of C.S. Lewis’s arguments from Mere Christianity, Craig thinks that evil is a departure from the way things ought to be – therefore there is a way things ought to be. For Craig, this demonstrates that there is a God who has and gives purpose. He doesn’t mean just any god either, but the Christian God specifically. How he’s picked Yahweh among the thousands of divine candidates, he doesn’t explain.

So let’s pretend the Earth was a paradise. That is to say, the same Earth with mountains, trees, birds, buildings, etc., but in idyllic existence. Picture a “heaven-like” Earth with no violence or war or evil. If such a world existed, think how difficult it would be to argue against the notion of an active, orchestrating deity. There is no lack of justice, there is no evil. Things are right. Even if God “hides” himself and withholds proof of his existence, the peace that envelopes the world would be a spectacle in his favor.

If the lack of evil would speak favorably to God’s existence, doesn’t the presence of evil undermine his case? The problem of evil only remains a problem if you want to keep God all knowing, good, powerful, and intelligent. A god who is all of those things can only violently clash with present ills and evils. Perhaps evil does show a “way things ought to be,” but in what way could that possibly excuse God from allowing it?

Christianity loves to present God’s relationship with us in terms of a family. Let’s continue the analogy. Who would let their child be ripped to pieces by animals, be slowly and cruelly tortured by other humans, allow sickness and starvation to wither them down to nothing – all while they had the power to stop it? And not just any power – All Power and All Goodness. If you had just a portion of God’s ability, you wouldn’t even break a sweat protecting people from evil. If only God were not so powerful, not so capable, not so knowing – then maybe we could entertain his possibility. But that ‘s the problem, he is just so eminently all-encompassing. It’s inexcusable.

Some Christians will respond that God allows evil so we can choose him. But you don’t need torture and pain in order to choose God. He could still help and protect people in so many ways. Maybe a person makes the decision/choice to rape and then murder someone. Does God really need to let the victim suffer? Why not just take them out of the world (or take the murderer out…)? Why not prevent it at the last moment? What does violent rape show anyway…his goodness? The usual response here is that God knows all/more than we do and so he knows best – or that God is mysterious. Great and mysterious is God’s goodness indeed if he needs to allow torture, violence, and evil to show how knowledgeable and kind he is. If this is the case, then consider perhaps he’s not as intelligent or wonderful as reported.

Freewill is simply not a defensible argument. Remember that Heaven is defined as a place that lacks evil, but also must necessarily contain freewill. Otherwise what’s the point of living here if we just become programmed robots in the very end?  If that were the case, what a cruel joke we’ve all been played! It bears repeating: Heaven is free of evil and full of freewill – meanwhile evil remains a problem here on Earth. The place we all actually live. Freewill is clearly not the answer to the problem.

According to theological thinking, the world suffers because of sin.  Why does the mud dauber paralyze and collect spiders to be slowly eaten alive in a cage? Or the parasitic wasp inject larvae into a caterpillar which later slowly slice their way out? Why do people need to starve and drown in tsunamis? Why does the male lion not pity its neighbor’s playful cubs? Why was Jillian Meagher assaulted, raped, and murdered? Or are there no miracles for insects, animals, and beautiful, kind, intelligent women?

If that sounds bleak, it’s because sometimes things are. Sometimes these things happen, and it’s truly awful. There is nothing good about evil and suffering and injustice. To think God allows evil so we can persevere and choose him is to think if there were no evil no one would strive to do anything. How bleak Heaven must look then. 

Naturalistic theories offer robust explanations which produce clear predictions about pain and suffering in this world. Theistic thoughts fail to make predictions about evil and suffering, and they fail to define their terms and understanding of the world. To offer sin and freewill as reasons for the way the world is simply does not satisfy nor get at the crux of the issue. Hope for love, peace, and justice is not found within the pages of the Bible, it’s found in education, the spreading of knowledge and understanding, and communities of people who deeply care about doing good in this world when there’s simply no deity to answer.

I went to school for Theology and Ancient Greek at the University of St. Thomas. I'm a slow reader and writer, enjoy art and nature, and am enthusiastic about science. I'm especially interested in evolution, ancient history and language, and poetry.

3 Comment on “Good God’s Conundrum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: